The Business Law Brief SM (January, 2002)

  1. It's Official: The Euro is Here.
    Effective January 1, 2002, 12 of the 15 member nations of the European Union have adopted a common currency - the Euro. Of European Union members, only the United Kingdom, Sweden and Denmark have not made the switch. At the current exchange rate, one Euro is worth about $0.88 in US Dollars. For information on currency, changeover plans, and the effect on business, banking and the public, see the Euro information website on the European Union's online website, Europa.
  2. USSC I: US Supreme Court Rules Plants May Be Patented.
    Mindful of its prior ruling in Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303, 206 USPQ 193 (1980) (484 PTCJ A-1, 6/19/80), that Section 101 of the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. §101, makes patentable "anything under the sun made by man," the Supreme Court has ruled that plants may be the subject of utility patents. The Court rejected the argument that the Plant Patent Act of 1930, 35 U.S.C. §§161-164, and the Plant Variety Protection Act of 1970, 7 U.S.C. §2321, et seq., were the exclusive means of protections for manufactured plants. J.E.M. AG Supply Inc. v. Pioneer Hi-Bred International Inc. U.S., No. 99-1996, (December 10, 2001).
  3. USSC II: Supreme Court Accepts Faxed, Emailed Filings.
    The closure of the Supreme Court Building, the delay in mail delivery, and the heightened security measures taken following the anthrax mailings disrupted the Court's traditional paper-based system for processing thousands of appeals, and has led to the Court's taking the unprecedented step of accepting e-mailed or faxed backup copies of legal filings. Because of the postal mail disruptions, the Court also may not have enough cases to fill its oral argument schedule for this fiscal year. These events have led to a discussion over whether the court should permanently adopt electronic filing, as other state and federal courts have done.
  4. Partnership Composed Solely for Tax Advantage is A Sham.
    A partnership with a foreign corporation in a tax-free jurisdiction whose primary purpose is to generate tax losses for the domestic partner and tax gains for the foreign partner may be a sham partnership. Noting the Tax Court's findings of "overwhelming evidence in the record that Saba and Otrabanda were organized solely to generate tax benefits for Brunswick," the Federal District Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia vacated and remanded the decision for further proceedings consistent with ASA Investerings Partnership v. Commissioner, 201 F.3d 505 (D.C. Cir. 2000), which was not yet released at the time of the Tax Court decision. Saba Partnership vs. Commissioner, No. 00-1328, U.S.Ct.App.D.C., (December 21, 2001).
  5. Mass Emailing Held to Constitute Trespass to Chattels.
    A divided California Appellate Court has upheld the decision of a lower court granting an injunction to Intel against Ken Hamidi, a disgruntled former employee who expressed his anger by sending mass emails to Intel's employees.A majority of the court found that the distraction to employees caused by such mailings constituted sufficient harm. The dissent pointed out that no damage was done to the receiving computer system, and no injury was suffered, and that, at most, employees were presented with an unsolicited email. Intel Corporation vs. Kourosh Kenneth Hamidi, C033076, CA Ct. App. 3rd Dist., December 10, 2001.
  6. Mandatory 11-Digit Dialing: Coming to a Telephone Near You?
    A reported imminent change in policy by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), would permit new area codes to be designated for use by only one particular technology, such as cell phones. Such action would help avoid the necessity for mandatory 11-digit dialing, a looming probability for populous areas around the country. The Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC) first proposed such a plan six years ago, but it was rejected by the FCC on the grounds that such a policy would put cell phone companies at a competitive disadvantage. As a result, effective January 5, 2002, 11-digit dialing will be mandatory for those in the 847 area code of suburban Chicago. A new area code - 224 - will be overlaid on that area, to the confusion and dismay of many. As reported in our August, 2001 issue, the FCC has consistently maintained that 7-digit dialing must be phased out.
  7. How's That Again?
    Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. 1692, et seq, it is illegal to use any false or misleading representation to collect a debt, including the representation "that any individual is an attorney or that any communication is from an attorney." 15 U.S.C. 1692e(3). As a practical matter, it means that an attorney must personally review each dunning letter sent from his office. In this case, the attorney moved for summary judgment, offering his affidavit that he had personally reviewed the letter sent to Plaintiff. But the court found that reason dictated that there was a triable issue of fact where the lawyer claimed to have personally reviewed more than 400,000 letters in the course of 8 months. Boyd v. Wexler, No 01-1809, 7th Cir. Ct.App., (December 28, 2001).
  8. Accord and Satisfaction Defeats Claim for Lost Airline Luggage.
    United Airlines calculated its liability to Plaintiffs for their lost luggage on international flights according to the Warsaw Convention, and paid each plaintiff the sum of $9.07 per pound, based on the maximum permissible baggage weight. But it was undisputed that United did not weigh the baggage, and under the Warsaw Convention, could not avail itself of its damage limitations provisions. However, the fact that each plaintiff endorsed, and deposited a check that stated "in full and complete settlement of any and all claims," constituted a valid accord and satisfaction, and was fatal to their claims. Curtin vs. United Air Lines, Inc., No 00-7274 (D.C. Cir December 28, 2001)
  9. Award of Non-Neutral Arbitrator Upheld.
    Addressing difficult issues under the Federal Arbitration Act, concerning how the grounds for vacating an award, 9 U.S.C. § 10(a)(1)-(3), should be applied to party-selected arbitrators, the 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals refused to set aside an award made by three arbitrators,one of whom also served as an expert witness for the Plaintiff. The court found that so long as the non-neutral arbitrator did not mislead the other arbitrators or prevent the other party from fairly presenting its case,the award would not be set aside. Delta Mine Holding Co. v. AFC Coal Properties, Inc., No 00-3646 (8th Cir. (December 28, 2001).
  10. What Your Business Should Do if the FBI Contacts You...
    The Patriot Act, passed as a result of the September 11, 2001 attacks on the U.S., great expanded domestic law enforcement surveillance powers, allowing the government to request information from companies during criminal investigations much more easily and for much less cause than in the past. This raises countless privacy issues for businesses, their employees and customers. But the new law does not require businesses to turn over information voluntarily. Although it may seem like a patriotic obligation, a business should not hand over information without requiring proof of a court order or a subpoena. What kinds of proof should you require for what kinds of information? See this helpful article from the Portland Press Herald Online.


© 2002, Perfectly Legal Publications, Inc. <http://www.PerfectlyLegalPubs.com/>
All Rights Reserved

Some links are not permanent and may expire.
The Business Law Brief was written as a public service.